Putting the 2025 Can-Am Outlander XT-P 1000R to Work
When a Sport-Minded Utility Quad Turns Yard Work Into an Off-Road Adventure
A recent need to move some rocks around the yard led to an opportunity to put our 2025 Can-Am Outlander XT-P 1000R test machine to work. This might not be as much fun as letting the quad’s 999cc, 101-horsepower Rotax V-twin loose on the trail, but the Outlander is still a utility machine at heart, and on this occasion, that’s exactly what we tasked it with. The escapade would test its strength and low-speed capability, and we took the chance to revel in every second of using it to help get the job done.
There’s a reason heavy machinery exists. Even a basketball-sized rock weighs anywhere from 40–200 pounds; that’s a huge spread, so for argument’s sake, let’s say one weighs 75 pounds. Do the math, consider the real estate on the Outlander’s front and rear racks, and you quickly realize that the machine’s 120-pound front and 240-pound rear rack capacities don’t seem like all that much. Chuck (or really struggle to lift) a few miniature boulders onto the high racks, and you’ve quickly hit the manufacturer’s recommended weight limit. We aren’t mad, though — when you enjoy all things ATV and four-wheeling, work can quickly become play.
Can-Am has no qualms about the XT-P 1000R having priorities that deviate from the model’s roots. While DPS and XT trim Outlander 1000s are listed for trail, work, and hunting use, the XT-P 1000R is set up for performance, trail, and recreational riding. Make no mistake about it, this is a utility quad that puts its fun foot forward. Its thumb throttle is accordingly sensitive, and exploring the initial portion of its travel can lift the front end with ease. That’s not great for work use, so we achieved the best results for moving rocks by putting the quad into four-wheel drive and low range, then toggling the adjustable throttle into Work mode (the other options being Sport and Standard). This helped smooth out the trek from point to point over uneven terrain, minimizing the likelihood of toppling one of the rocks off the machine.
After multiple runs with the Outlander’s payload maxed out, we can safely deduce it’s a willing and able partner when work is asked of it. The Outlander was seemingly unfazed by a few afternoons’ worth of moving what we should have used a trailer to tackle (the quad’s 1,830-pound towing capacity would have come in handy), and it seamlessly integrated into a work setting despite its rec-riding priorities.
When the Outlander wasn’t unfazed was when we had to navigate it around a stationary skid steer. In a sense, this situation replicated what some will experience when rock crawling: flexing the suspension, letting the 4x4 system do its thing, and moving as slowly as possible to navigate over one obstacle while simultaneously around another.
Doing so necessitated putting the left front tire up on a large rock, and the slope of the lawn meant the Outlander’s weight loaded up on the climbing tire instead of the right front, which was down on the slick, mud-ridden ground. With four-wheel drive engaged and the machine in high range, the quad just spun the tires and slid sideways off the intended line. Engaging low range helped with torque delivery, yet the 4x4 system kept shoving power to the tire on the ground instead of the one trying to climb. That was fine until we hit the limit of the Outlander’s suspension travel and lifted the right front tire off the ground. For some reason, the four-wheel-drive system didn’t like three-wheeling — it was as if it couldn’t decide where to direct power, repeatedly shifting attempts at traction back and forth between the front tires as the rear tires spun in the mud.
At this point, forward progress seemed unlikely, and we started to wonder if the Outlander’s 3,500-pound winch would be necessary to get back to higher ground. The Outlander had one more trick up its sleeve. Can-Am has been perpetually revising its Visco-Lok four-wheel-drive system, and the Outlander here is equipped with its Visco-4Lok front differential, allowing the rider to control when the front differential is locked (and unlocked).
We’ve long been pining for the brand to offer this, as in the past, the machine would have made up its own mind about when to engage the front locker. With fingers mentally crossed, we thumbed the front differential to full lock. This finally did the trick, and the quad was able to climb over the rock and around the construction equipment.
Maybe chalk some of the drama up to the Outlander’s stock 27-inch XPS Trail King 2 tires. They’re sufficient for sport and standard riding, but when it comes to work or mud traction, there’s a bit to be desired. Or maybe we just need to recalibrate our expectations.
$16,599 might be a heck of a lot more money than a wheelbarrow from the local hardware store, but the fun that comes from getting relatively heavy hauling yard work done with a willing machine is effectively invaluable to an ATV enthusiast.
The Outlander XT-P 1000R’s priority is and always will be trail and performance riding, yet it got the job done just fine. It’s a testament to how solid the Outlander’s bones and fundamentals are, given how it handled being loaded to its limit. The Outlander never broke a sweat and came back asking for more — that’s our kind of sport-minded utility quad.
Ross hosts The Hooniverse Podcast. He has been in the off-road world since he was a kid riding in the back of his dad’s YJ Wrangler. He works in marketing by day and in his free time contributes to Hooniverse, AutoGuide, and ATV.com, and in the past has contributed to UTV Driver, ATV Rider, and Everyday Driver. Ross drives a 2018 Lexus GX460 that is an ongoing build project featured on multiple websites and the podcast.
More by Ross Ballot
Comments
Join the conversation